Sorry

Hey guys sorry for this week without updates, will be writing soon.

Sneak peaks:

-Blog Format change

-Scarface

-Magnolia

-Into The Storm

-Bad Lieutenant

expect it this days and

HAPPY CHRISTMAS!

2012

First of all, I watched a really bad copy, so Special effects and CGI count's be appreciate due to bad image quality.

Then, Roland Emmerich's movies are generally destroyed by critics, and in my mind Im one, so I'll just follow a tradition.

You could really enjoy this movie if you liked War of The Worlds and you are a retard. The main problem is the Script. THE SCRIPT! The whole thing appears to be written with a manual. First, characters. Remember Tom Cruis, Dakota Fanning and Justin Chatwin as the Ferrier family (War of the worlds)? We had, divorced parents, little girl who likes his father but recognised that her mother's boyfriend is a successful man too, then the a bit older kid who is kinda fighting with his father and calls him by his name. We have Dad as a working man who has some things he likes but waits to do them after his shitty job. And we have Mom, she is happy with his new acquisition but still have feelings for his ex.

So, in 2012 we had, well, THE EXACT SAME CHARACTERS. Seriously John Cusack is the father and some never seen before actors play his family, WotW model.

Acting was another BIG problem. This just shows how unprofessional Emmerich can be. Spilberg hired top of the range people, Cruise, Fanning, Tim Robbins, etc. Here we had Cousack and well, no one else worth mentioning o yes, I was forgetting, it's just that his acting was so bad that my mind automatically forgot him , Chiwetel Ejiofor , I had seriously forgotten this guy!

After the Family factor (WotW), we had the black guy factor (Independence Day) with Chitahajdasdasdas or however his name is spelled, and with "The President". This is based on a black guy who practically saves the world.

Then there was the political bad white guy (Independence day too (James Redhorn))

There was also the save everyone no matter the cost factor, the I generalise and stereotype Russian people as fat and wealthy factor, the all arabs are evil factor, the new husbands can die and no one cares factor, the little smart girl factor. They were all in!

Seriously, he had a manual. The Emmerich's guide to a badass Hollywood box office burner.

The story had holes as big as lunar craters.

But still, the worst part is the ending. No no, I'm lying, the best part was the ending, as it ended my suffering.

If you want to see a better Emmerich movie go and rent Independence day, or just turn your TV on, its always on in some channel, or if not, something by Michael Bay , generally are much more fun and less depressing we are all gonna die, Armaggedon for instance.

Now, if you want to watch some seriously good sci-fi weird stuff, you can go watch something by J.J. Abrams, he is like the king of freaks, but produces great movies such as Cloverfield or Star Trek.

So, See you guys soon, and please don't waste your money by watching this in the cinema, its just not worth it.

Why YOU are so special

This is not a review, and the title is no the one of a movie. They say Rupert Murdoch can reach one of every six people or something like these. I speculate that about 3 of every 6,692,030,277 people read at least one of my posts here at the blog. So, only about 0.000000000042% of the world's population reads my blog. That means that 6,692,030,269 do not read it. the most VIP stuff aren't even near as exclusive as this.

So YOU yes YOU I'm writing for you, so do comment in the posts please.

Thanks Folks.

The Usual Suspects

Two nights ago I was looking for something to watch, regularly when I find nothing at the video store I just look which of my movies I want to watch again. This has made me watch Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs and Wag The Dog like a million times. This time I went for the Dogs, and as I reached to grab the video, this move just fell on me and it was The Usual Suspects. I knew this was a good one, and saved it for last night.

I started watching it and fell asleep exactly 13 minutes into it. Then woke up seven minutes later and rewind it, at this point I remembered what DF told me, "Its slow, but has some great last five minutes."

I gotta tell you this, Im not ruining the movie, but if you really like the whole suspense thing, stop reading this NOW and go rent the fucking thing.

With the tag line in my DVD was: "In a world where nothing is what it seems you've got to look beyond..." and that kinda gives it away.

The whole movie is really well made and I didn't think it was slow at any point. It was actually really intriguing and nicely made. But it is just too obvious. You might say that I'm just being smart and going like "O, no, iI got it from the beginning", but from half the movie forward, it was so obvious. Why? Money. That's the simple answer. Lets see, who acts in it, El Che Guebara (Benicio Del Toro) who could fit perfectly Sergeant Jew in Inglorious Bastards, Alex Baldwin's Brother, Kevin Pollak, and some other guys, and then we have Gabriel Byrne, who is a really great actor, but I think the character doesn't suit him. And last but not least, Kevin Spacey.

Now, why would you pay Spacy, who is the most expensive one here to make the whole movie if the movie is not about him? What really gives it away is how the other bad guys change and he is always the same. It might be the Hungarian Mobsters or the Argentine smugglers, but the whole think points at the cripple (Spacey). For example, as you might know, Marlon Brando appeared only like a minute in Apocalypse Now but still was the highest paid actor. Why? Because the movie was about him. About finding him. Here, the movie is abou his view, and each time it is a bit different revealing the whole story.

I think it is a really well made film, a bit overrated in IMDB with 8.7 and position #21 in the top 250. But still very recommendable.

Parental Advisory

After a couple of complaints of some men (Pictured Below) form a very small island in the north called UK (Although everyone knows that place ain't real) about my language, for using words like the S word (shit), the F word (Fuck) and BS (Bullshit) (But never the C word) I'm issuing this Parental Advisory. Now everyone can be Happy!

Assassination of a High School President

Its now quarter to three in the morning, and I am utterly confused.
I really don't know what to think. I've just seen Brett Simon's Assassination of a High School President, and I just don't know what to think.
The only reason I know who Brett Simon is, is because I just saw his only movie, which never got released.
Was this movie the best thing I've ever seen? Maybe not, but was it near?
Was this the worst piece of footage in the same film roll? No, as I've seen "Jeepers Creepers 2" and that definitely takes the prize.
But so, then what the hell have I've just seen?
Well, (Might Contain Spoilers) let me tell you what I've just seen. I saw Claire Trevor (Yes, the Queen Of Film Noir) fucking with Zack Efferon (Yes, Im misspelling his name and I won't Hyper-link him). Seriously, this was "Brick" 2. It wasn't as good as Brick, but I never expected it. The first 30 minutes I thought this was the greatest thing I've ever see, it was just making me laugh about it, and wasn't really sure if I was laughing at them, or at the way they are parodying american films. But then the whole thing just became good, in a really weird way.
Sorry, by this point generally in my reviews, you already know everything about the movie and how much I either loved it, despised it or was bored by. So, the story is about a sophomore teen in high school in USA, and how he wished to be a reporter, and as he is given the task to do a cover article on the High School President, a really superficial and stupid basketball player. The SATs are stolen and his boot liking story makes our detective to realise that is Mr. President who stole the exams. The thing is that all the time you are going like : "C'mon I wont buy your bullshit", but then in the next scene you go like "OOOOOOOO, I see now, how smart". And the whole movie is like that, even Bruce Willies is in it, acting as the headmaster, no offence to Mr I. D. Tate, but I would love to have Bruce as my Headmaster. The thing is that he is not just the headmaster, he is how his characters would be as Headmasters, because in the movie he is also a veteran from the first gulf war. So the whole thing is just, just, just, I DONT KNOW WHAT IT IS!!
Now, the tricky part. Do I recommend this movie?
Yes, I do.
Wait! Do I?
Yes, after a lot of taught (that's bullshit) I do recommend this movie.
Now the thing is that I really want you to watch it and as it never got really released, I will be lending this DVD to anyone interested. Well, I think that is it, I should really get some rest.
Cheers!

Actors I Would Watch In Anything

There are some actors that can play anything and do it in such a way that they become the character, and others that adapt the character to themselves, for instance, Nicolas Cage, who I find to be a great actor, but when I'm watching one of his movies, Im watching him, not the character.
Jack Nicholoson is one of the greatest actors ever to set foot in Hollywood, and can play anything that he will rock it. For instance, he plays a great drunk in Easy Rider and a great psychopath in The Shining, and manages to be utterly charming in Something's Gotta give. This is because he makes the characters a part of himself and that's why he is so believable.
Sir Morgan Freeman goes just with Jack, from Driving Miss Daisy to The War of the Worlds, in which the only good part is his narrative. But he does fall with some technicalities when he is bought just for his name like in Bruce All Mighty or Batman (Good movies Which personally I just can't stand).
Anthony Hopkins is another actor who achieves to basically, win my heart and mid. He can be starring in a classic (Silence of the lambs / The Elephant Man) or being a suport actor for some really bad movie (The Mask of Zorro) but he always find a way to be the best. By the way, I saw one of his new movies like two or three years ago, Fracture, and it was more than descent, recommendable.
Sir Michael Caine falls into the same criteria as Morgan Freeman, as he is a great actor but Hollywood tends to use him for movies like well, Batman, again. But still, a MAGNIFICENT actor.
Michael Douglas is another example of a great actor. I think I like him so much because his characters represent what I wanna be. Still, he hasn't made anything really good, well I mean, his acting is great, but really, in which great movie has he starred? Any thoughts? Wall Street maybe, but still.... I think he should stop doing magnificent appearances in crappie movies such as Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, or The In-Laws. And do something really good ones in for all. (I was wrong, he made a good movie recently King of California, it isn't a masterpiece but it is nice, decent and fun)
(By this point I'm realising this are all old men)
Emma Thompson and Meryl Streep are both great actresses but their work tends to fall in my boring lists but still, great actresses.

Now for the Bias Part,
Tarantino, I really think that he is a great actor, in movies like From Dawn Till Dusk or Pulp Fiction (Bonnie), he is a really good actor, but maybe it is because i worship him so much (Except for Inglorious Bestards as you might have read recently).
Then I agree with DF (My films teacher) with Denzel Washington, (From Carbon Copy to American Gangster) and I just realised that we both have Emma Thompson. Al Pacino and Robert Deniro are both great actors that I would also watch anything with, but I think that is kind of obvious so I wont get into details. O and yes, Gary Oldman.
Ray Liota and Joe Pesci are two magnificent gangsta kind of actors that I was leaving behind.
Well, thats it so far.
Enjoy!

The Deal

Last night I watched this movie called "The Deal", the only real reason why a saw this is because William Macy is the protagonist, and I find him to be utterly fantastic and hilarious.
The movie is about this film producer who is bankrupt and hasn't done anything for like 8 years, his nephew interrupts him when he is trying to commit suicide and gives him his script, which gives him the opportunity to continue his career. As the movie develops, the excellent script turns into some kind of crazy Jew movie about a Jew who is some kind of black shwarsenegeregen and kills Muslims and stuff. The process is fantastically made and the whole time I couldn't stop laughing.
IMDB gave it it 5.8 but I think that people just didn't get it. Most jokes are basic, but they have a second meaning, and if you get them, the whole thing is marvellous. Seriously, I really recommend it, it was just what I wanted to see.
See you soon.

Barry Lyndon

Following my Kubrick watching week, I watched "Barry Lyndon". The way in which the XVII century was portrayed was impeccable, and the way in which the editing is made transmits the whole slow pace of this society. I had a really hard time liking it. It was really nice, and I really wanted to like it, but I just didn't. I feel terrible, I can't believe I didn't like something made by Kubrick, but I just didn't. Was it really fantastically made? Yes, but it was slow and boring and at any point did it absorb me or intrigue me in any way. I have to confess an atrocity, i fast fowered some parts, well lots of them, they were just SO slow. I had to separate it in 3 viewing. I love slow stuff like sit and listen to Bach or Beethoven while padding my dog in a rainy day, but this was just boring. Maybe I'm Americanising , in that case well, I'll just rent Terminator 8 or transformers the revolution of Mac.
I just read this before posting it and my review is pretty crappy. Sorry guys!
See you soon.

Un Prophete

On Thursday evening my mom told me that we were invited to the opening of the "European Cinema Week" here in Buenos Aires. Personally I enjoy going to those openings, seeing the directors and drinking almost good champagne while talking smart things and bragging about who I love French cinema, so I said sure, lets go!. My father opposed but he went with us just because he had nothing to do. After leaving home I checked IMDB on this "Un Prophete", and it had 8.1, and the Tags were "Mafia, Inmates, Prison" and the description "A young Arab man is sent to a French prison where he becomes a mafia kingpin", and that's what I told my mom when she asked what this movie was about, and she said "O, a French detective Noire film, good" and I said "No, its nothing like that its Mafia gang violent prison stuff" and she apparently achieved to misunderstand my words and said "o good, i like French detective films", so I said, Whatever.
When we got into the theatre, some Cannes big shot explained the whole thing and presented some European directors and actors who where in the theatre with us, everyone applauded and when he said "every year in Cannes the journalist expect something strong, so we wait until Saturday and show the strongest film we have, and this is it." That was when me mom said "mmm, I think we are leaving" and I opposed rotundly.
The film started, it was good, but then half an hour passed until something happened, and that something was this guy sticking a razor in his mouth and bleeding, then my mom left and so did lots of people. Five minutes later this guy was stabbing another one with this razor with his mouth and lots of Tarantino style blood spilling all around. The guy on my right was an american film critic and he was covering his face saying "Shit o shit shit", and I told him "Pretty fucked up huh?" and he said "Totally fucked up". As the movie continued it turned more and more unrealistic and French. This meaning that for 40 minutes nothing happened. The director sitting just in front of me had directed something important like, academy award wining or something like that. He fell asleep, so did the producer by his side. The Spanish directors and producers at his right just left, so did the Cannes big shot, who returned 1 minute before the screening ended. The movie was good, yes but it over 60% of the material was unnecessary which made it extremely long. I fell asleep for like 5 minutes and when I woke up I had no idea what was going on, but it was so late and I was so tiered that I didn't really mind. I didn't left just because my mom said I wouldn't like it and she was right, but I wouldn't let her know that.
I realised no one else was enjoying this when some granny's phone started ringing and no one cared, she even answered the fucking thing and no one cared.
In the last 30 minutes (of 155) I was so sick of this thing that I started looking around, in my row, only twos eats were still occupied, one of which, me.
Finally, it ended but I wouldn't just leave, I wanted to look intellectual in front of the directors and act like I was reading the credits, impossible thing as I had left my glasses at home, then I clapped and run away.
Was it good? Yes
Did I enjoy it? Not a bit.
See you soon guys, sorry this one was so long.

Inglorious Tarantino

I was really exited by the idea of watching "Inglorious Bastards or Bustards or whatever", and yesterday morning my father told me the video store had send it and he had already watch it twice because it was so great. Generally I don't share tastes in films with my father, but he does has some hits, this wasn't one of the. The acting is overacting. The plot does not exist. The story is completely unbelievable. This is fiction with over-fictional elements brought in a semi-serious setting. A farmer hiding Jews in the basement, being "interrogated" friendly by a Nazi, while the guards wait outside, they come in later and shoot them all and let one escape that is the only good part of the movie and actually, It is stupid. The stupidity does not end. This was not a funny movie, this was not satire, this was not entertainment, this was a long long list of stupid scenes, one unbelievable plot hole after another. An insult to history, an insult to every intelligent movie-lover. I was mad after seeing this. I really do not understand why people give compliments to this movie. Really.
As you might now or not, I love whatever Tarantino directs, writes or spits on, because his style is my style. But this, this was just bad, bad and stupid, stupid and american. If this was directed by any other director I would just say, "bah, its bad, but entertaining", but when you expect Tarantino, you don't expect entertaining, you expect Jackie Brown or Pulp Fiction or Crazy Grindhouse, but never entertaining. This is really bad. Just Bad. I watched it with my brother, and he hated it too, my mother hated it too, but my dad loved it. I don't know, but I think that this is just crap. And Pitt, someone who's acting I find generally fantastic fails in every single way. Mr. Waltz does saves the film, as his acting is superb. But as a whole, its just bad, really bad.

IB stuff

Books to read:

Sites to visit:

Essays to read:

DVD with director’s commentaries:

People to interview:

Other: (youtube interviews, makings of…)

To be Completed

Gi-I-Joe

The people at the video store insisted for weeks for me to wathch this movie, as I kept insisnting that I wanted to see something new, but I had watched everything else. So, I finally said Ok, the hell with it, send me Gi-I-Joe.
I got the movie, and as soon as it started I said, wait, this is bad, but not that bad. Then It all becamed stupid ridiculous and childish. The script is the worst thing sience, well, the worst thing.
Just, the story is so, stupid. It`s like well, don`t expect anything good from this movie. The acting is terrible too.
Generally I would continue distroying this "film" but its just so borring that I will stop.
DO NOT SPEND MONEY OR TIME IN THIS THING!

District 9

I wasnt very sure what to expect form this movie. Was it a freak movie about aliens? Was it a really bad "thing" about stuff. Well, it wasn`t. It was fantastic, great connotations of reality and fantastic special effects. The whole story narrated by this guy who looks as a basic banker, no crazy Schauarezenegereneaseagen acting, just emotions and a documentary, very much like Cloverfield (which I really enjoyed).
So, really great sci-fi movie, with some great acting, and realistioc special effects. The way in which is made transmits how posible it is for this aliens to live with us, I mean there is no point in the whole movie in which I said "Wait a minute, that makes no sense".
Seriously a great Sci Fi

Bellamy

I really liked this movie, I felt diferent while watching it, its just diferent. The story is just basic french couple with no children wiuth the great performance of Gérard Depardieu and as the story evolves, the audience has to rely on facts of their own asumption as the film has many holes which are just suggested but never clear. As this parisian investigator starts a independant investigation while on holidays, all the characters get involved in a tragedy, linking peoples drinking problems and childhood.
Weired? Yes
Diferent? Yes
Great? Yes
Really recomendable

Crank 2 + Transporter 3

AWSOME
No, seriosuly, really great, it was just what I expected and nothing more or less.
In transporter 3 you have hour and a half of high speed persuits and riduculous high jumps with audis and beemers. What can be better than that? Script is absoultely un realistical and characters unbelievable, but its just.. FUN.
Well, then is Crank 2, i`ve been waiting for it for months, and it was actually much funnier that what I expected, an army of prostitutes shooting up pimps and drug carteles. Just amazing, extremely fun and entretaining.
Seriously, if you are looking for a basic pop corn eating block buster, this is fantastin. Seriously fantastic.
See you soon.

Full Metal Jacket

Well, yes, its been quite a long time since I wrote my last review, but well, it was a harsh year.
So, lets starta again!
Full Metal Jacket (1987)
Kubrik is one of my favorite directors, but I don´t know why every time I go the the Video Rental, I forget to rent his movies. In this ocation, I remembered and took "Nacido para Matar" (Born to Kill) wich was Full Metal Jacket.
I was surprised to find the actor from, I think is Law an Order Criminal Intent or something like it, a really great actor with a whole retard face wich transmites tension and paranoya.
With the guy who plays the little boy`s father in Transporter 2, as a protagonist, this was an exelent film, I was really surprised how much opf the movie is dedicated to the training, and just the second half is about Vietam.
The feelings this movie transmits are utterly shoking, and comunication between characters builds up the real `Nam experience.
Really a great movie, totally recomendable.
See you nex time!

Rationale for research Proyect.

Information will be posted about the research proyect in the near future.
I will be investigating how Car chases have evolved comparing Bulliy (Steve McQueen 1968) and Ronin (1998)

Productions 2009

Short Film

Documentary

Info.

This is useful information.

Robert Rodriguez + Quentin Tarantino

Mr. Tarantino illuminated our world in the early 90`s with movies such as Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs and Jackie Brown. Quentin is a close friend to the director Robert Rodriguez, and is almost as crazy as him. So, you can imagine that a combination between this two would be amazing. And there is such a thing.
In the beginning there was light, and then From Dusk Till Dawn Arrived. This was written by Tarantino, directed by Rodriguez and propagandized by George Clooney and Tarantino. So, a crime road movie at the beginning portraying a crazy raping unstable youngest brother (Tarantino) who helps his older bank robbing brother (Clooney). As they escape, they kidnap a family, consisting of Harvey Kietel as an ex preacher, who has lost his wife in a car accident, and his jap adopted kid and his eldest daughter. As they cross to Mexico, and wait for a smuggler in the "Titty Twister" bar. This is an obscure place, where at night the staff turns into vampires and eat all of the customers. A road crime movie mutates in the way that only this writer director combination could do.
Extremely recommendable.
Expect a continuation for this post
Thank You

Solstice

Probably one of the worse movies I've ever seen. Absolute stereotyped teen chillier. The terrible story is about a group of north american teenagers who travel to a holiday house to celebrate "St. Jhons" and the solstice. One of the girls had a twin sister, who committed suicide in that same house about a year earlier. and her spirit starts to tack to her in creepy ways. After a series of stereotyped shitty scenes, in which we are introduced to a creepy old guy who looks as he is going to kill them all, but off course, he is the good guy who looks creepy because his granddaughter disappeared.

Well, the thing is that at the end, they tell us that it was Sophie (suicide girl) that run over the little creepy old man grand daughter, and because of the guilt, she kills herself. Sophie's ex, who had buried the body in the woods gets killed when he is running drunk from little girl's spirit who is vomiting some kind of mud full of warms.

And we get this ending in which Megan (the other twin) and some guy just walk away from scene saying something like "we are going to be happy now" "yes, no more dark magic" "haha".

WHAT A PIECE OF CRAP!!!!!!

Holly Imdb gave it 5.4, and I thin they were merciful, as 3 is way too much.

Hope you don't see this piece of shit, and see you in the next review.

Chiao!

From Now On

Well dear followers, from now on, i'm going to write reviews for each and every movie I watch.

I will also make some reviews for past movies, so stay channeled because there is going to be a lot of reviewing going on.

I will start right now. So, hope you enjoy.

Jason Delgado Script for Tarantino looking movie.

Ext. Scene - Car three characters

Three 17 year old [males], TOny is sitting at the driver seat of the car, el cesar is sitting in the hood and riely is lying on one side. Stereotypical characters, italoamerican, cuban and the “black guy”.

Toni

Dialog. So Now we wait

El Cesar

(Cubanly)

Ok, wey, but I have to to take a leak

Riely

C’mon when is this shorty coming

Fade to black

RICH HOUSE, Jamie is a baby looking boy, about 17 year old, problems with family, thinks he hates his family because his father is never around and his mother is dictatorial. Leaving his house

INTERIOR

Jamie {Shouting}

I’m Leaving Mom!

Jamie’s mom {Shouting from upper floor}

Where are you going James?

JAMIE

I’m meeting some friends, be back for dinner.

Jamie’s mom

Which friends?

JAMIE

You don’t know them, Bye!

{Indistinct shouting From Mother}

Ext. Scene - Car three characters

Jamie arrives to the meeting point, he is reserved and tries to fit in with the gang.

jameie

Sorry I’m Late

{El Cesar returns}

Tony

You don’t leave us waiting

EL CESAR

Yes, don’t screw it up amigo ok? .

Riely

Heard on the hood that you have some interesting in the stove for us bro.

EL Cesar

Lets get going cabrones, we have some business to do.

Riely

Yes, Lets get craking, I could use a beer

TONY {Turns the car on and as he shift into gear, fail and stall. Second tray gents the car moving} MMMMM

FADE TO BLACK

CAFE, DARK PLACE SMOKE EVERYWHERE, IDEALLY ROUND TABLE, PEOPLE TALKING AND DRINKING COFFEE.

TONY

Ok mates, we need to get this thing moving, Jamie, what is this business you have to offer?

Jamie

Ok, so as you might know, my father is Jason Delgado, the banker.

Riley

So, you are loaded white boy.

Jamie

Well yes not me, but my father is.

TONY

So what is in there for us? You don’t need no money.

jamie

The thing is that he is a cheap bastard and he’s never around, and never passes me a dime

EL CESAR

Whay about your mom?

JAMIE

She’s just stupid, no worry

RIELY

No worry about what white boy? You haven’t told us anything yet.

JAMIE

Thats true, and I apologise, the thing is that I’m running short on cash and I need some. So, last week the safety’s key got stuck, so all of the jewels are just there in a drawer waiting for someone to take that. O, here is the waitress.

EL CESAR

Cheka esta senorita brothers.

WAITRESS

Hi guys, what are you going to have?

TONY

I’ll have a Scotch in the rocks please.

Riely

I’ll have a beer

EL CESAR

Make that 2

JAMIE

I’ll have a lime water please.

WAITRESS

I’ll have to see some ID please.

TONY

MMM, I’ll just have a coke

RIELY

Ill have a Cold Cappuccino lady

EL CESAR

I’ll have a Virgin Cuba Libre senorita.

WAITRES

OK, so it’s 2 cokes, one frappuccino and one water.

TONY

Yes, whatever.

JAMIE

What a PEEEP, no guys?

EL CESAR

Watch that language, there’s ladies in the room.

JAMIE (LAUGHING)

Screw’em

EL CESAR

Screw you hombre!

RIELY

Hey homies! Relax

EL CESAR

And screw you blanquito.

RIELY

What was that again?

TONY

Would you dorks just shut up! There’s business to do.

{Huming form everyone}

EL CESAR (Breaking the Ice)

So what do you need us for, you can just take it and sell it yourself.

JAMIE

No way, I'll be the first suspect. So i need you to brake in the house and make it look like just another brake in.

TONY

How much do you think the whole thing would be made into cash?

RIELY

(Interrupting)Yes, lets talk about numbers bro.

TONY

Riely, let him talk.

JAMIE

About 50 grand, or more.

{Faces}

TONY

So, what’s your price

JAMIE

What do you mean?

TONY

Your fee genius, how much do you want, you do think we do stuff for free right?

JAMIE

I was thinking you could keep, i don’t know, 5 10 percent maybe.

{RIELY + EL CESAR START TO TALK IRRITATED}

TONY

SHHHH let me talk. We've known each other many years, but this is the first time you ever came to me for counsel or for help. I can't remember the last time that you invited me to your house for a cup of coffee, you never wanted my friendship.

JAMIE

It’s just....

EL CESAR

Let the man Talk.

TONY

I understand, you have a good living and you didn't needed friends like us,But, uh, now you come to me, and you say: "Don TONY, give me justice." But you don't ask with respect. You don't offer friendship. You don't even think to call me Godfather. Instead, you come into my house on the day my daughter is to be married, and you ask me to do murder for money.

JAMIE

What daughter? Murder Who? What are you talking about?

RIELY

Isn’t that like the opening form The Godfather two?

EL CESAR

No, i think its from the third one

TONY

It’s form the first one actually, but that’s nothing to do with this, Im trying to make a point here.

RIELY

Which one is it? I got no shit from all of that jaba waba.

TONY

Its 70 percent for us, you can keep the rest

JAMIE

Make it 60

EL CESAR

65

JAMIE

Deal

EL CESAR

You could have just said that from the beginning, couldn’t you Tony?

TONY

You guys are so un-professional

FADE OUT TO CAr

Ext. Scene - Car four characters

TONY

So, when?

JAMIE

Tomorrow night my daddy is leaving with my mom at 11 pm.

EL CESAR

Hombre, then you’ll open the door at eleven o five

JAMIE

That should be all-right.

Ext. Scene - HOUSE NIGHT

{CAR LEAVES}

EL CESAR

That’s us guys.

{CAR WITH LIGHTS OFF GETS NEAR THE HOUSE}

EXT. SCENE - DOOR

TONY

Be quiet

{EL CESAR TRIES TO OPEN THE DOOR, BUT ITS LOCKED}

EL CESAR

It’s locked guys, the shortie told us off!

RIELY

Don’t go all hysterical girls, i guess its just to make it look more real, for the inssurance or stuff like that.

SONY

Wait here, I've got a crowbar in the car.

{OPENS THE DOOR}

INTERIOR - HOUSE DARK NIGHT

EL CESAR

I’ve got a bad feeling hermanos.

RIELY

Keep it cool, its gonna be allright

TONY

JACKPOT!!!!!!!

EL CESAR

Chingado, mira esto hombre.

RIELY (acting all black)

O yea bro, thats what I call bling

TONY

Ok, lets get going

RIELY

Wait, there’s some computers and stuff here

EL CESAR

O, yea

TONY

I’ll open the trunk, be right back

[AS EL CESAR AND RIELY ARE TAKING A COMPUTER, LIGHTS COME ON, THE POLICE IS THERE]

[EVERYONE STARTS RUNNING]

CREDITS

Jackie's interview

This is an interview made to Jackie Rubinstein.

Favourite film of all times:

Titanic

Why?

I don’t know,,,,,, first of all because there is “true love”, and I love this things, I never analysed it deeply, as i was just a kid, and I used just to watch it, not think to much about it. 

Non Hollywoodian Movies ive seen:

“A French one, i cant remember the name, well. I've seen some European movies, because of my dad” “Didn’t like them so much.

Favorite Actor:

Heath Leadger, Leonardo Di Caprio, 

Favorite Actress:

Cameron Diaz, 

How do you feel about Mel Gibson?

“Good, i like him, he is cool”

Bour Identity or James Bond?

James Bond

Movies pre 1960:

None that I can think of right now.

Favourite.....

Cartoon Movie:  “Little Mermaid”

TeenFlik: Twiligh

NonTeenflik: 

Favorite cinema: Hoyts Unicenter

Home DVD or cinema: Home

Popcorn or M&Ms: Popcorn

Last film you’ve creid in:

The notebook

Recommendations for a teenflick:

“It must be interesting, it mustn’t be serious, non old people stuff, well, a bit, but not so much, come on! I like love movies, so, well.”

Action or Sci Fi: 

Action

Thank you Jackie.

Location Manager

According to wikipedia, "The Location Manager is responsible for the finding and securing locations to be used and coordinating the logistics involved for the production to successfully complete its necessary work. They are also the face of the production to the community and responsible for addressing the issues that may arise due to the production's impact on the community." "The Location Manager typically is also the primary Location Scout for a film. They usually oversee several other scouts and assistant managers during the course of a show. A location manager will commonly work closely with the director and theproduction designer during preproduction to find and secure their expressed creative vision. The manager is also responsible for public relations at the locations used and the safety of the crew during filming.

A Location Scout is responsible for the initial scouting of all the locations used in a film and translates the writer and director’s vision for the look of the scene into a viable and appropriate location. An experienced Location Scout will take into account all the logistics necessary for the production to adequately work."

So, its the guy that gets the places to shoot the film. Kind of a travel agent for film productions.

WELCOME TO THE MOST AMAZING FILM BLOG IN HISTORY!!!!

O YES, I'VE SAID IN HISTORY.

Analysis in 9 minutes, Set and Shot Design

This is an analysis about the image that you see up there. That is from Tarantino's Pulp Fiction (1994), the scene in which Vincent Vega (Travolta) and Mia Wallace (Thurman) dance to the "Jack Rabbit Slims Twist Contest".

Regarding the visual of this still, it is clear the use of light and basic colours to create a twisty jazzy mood. The camera focus is based in the main characters in the front and the rest is blurry, mainly because of the lighting which makes the aperture to be much bigger due to the poor lighting causing the blurry background.

The clothes chosen for this scene communicate an important part of the personalities of the characters, which are both very classic and formal but seductive at the same time.

The space in which the scene is set is a Retro Bar in Los Angeles, which is at least confusing as there is not such a thing as a clear time space correlation. All though the movie is set in the 90s, the character's clothes are universal and, for example, Vincent drives a Impala (or Bel Air).....

To Be continued

Soviet Montage Theory

Soviet montage theory is an approach to understanding and creating cinema that relies heavily upon editing. Although Soviet filmmakers in the 1920s disagreed about how exactly to view montage, Sergei Eisenstein marked a note of accord in "A Dialectic Approach to Film Form" when he noted that montage is "the nerve of cinema," and that "to determine the nature of montage is to solve the specific problem of cinema."

While many Soviet filmmakers, such as Lev Kuleshov, Dziga Vertov, and Vsevolod Pudovkin put forth explanations of what constitutes the montage effect, Eisenstein's view that "montage is an idea that arises from the collision of independent shots" wherein "each sequential element is perceived not next to the other, but on top of the other" has become most widely accepted.

First Textual Analysis

The Departed

Analysis

I will analyse the firs five minutes of the movie “The Departed”. This movie was made in 2006 as a remake from the Chinese movie “Internal Affairs”, and directed by Martin Scorsese. It was wrote by William Monahan. The writer is an american award winning script writer, he has directed other films such as “Kingdom of Heaven” (2005). In this movie, two police officers Billy Costigan (Leonardo Di Caprio ) and “Colin” (Mat

Damon) will be infiltrated in their oposite sides, the good policeman will be an undercover inside the force for the Irish Mafia and the low life cadet will be a police officer undercover in the Mafia. Violence, scams and betrayal will create a number of blood marked trails that will bring this story to an unexpected conclusion. This movie has an incredible cast including, Jack Nicholson, Alec Baldwin, Mark Wahlberg and Martin Sheen between others.

Martin Scorsese is one of the most recognised directors of all times, he has directed movies such as Goodfellas, Casino, Gangs of New York, The Aviator, The Colour of money and Raging Bull between others.

This opening scene has as a dramatic purpose to introduce the main characters to the audience and set the time and space, and specially to introduce in a much grater way to the character represented by Nicholson.

The movie starts with a scene were a riot of black people is taking place. This seems to be footage from 80’s news, or a documentary.

Scorsese has chosen a numeber of stylistic devices as to acomplish with his target.

In first place, the use of camera. Eye level angle is used the most in this extract, along with medium angle, but in a smaller frequency. The eye level objective is to create the feeling that the audience is situated inside the movie, in Nicholson’s place. This also means that at least this piece of the movie is based on this character’s point of view.

Medium shots shots predominate in this extract. The angle of the camera is used as to maintain the most important subject in this first minutes, this is Frankie Costello (Nicholson). There are some long shots and some close ups, as to show specifics, such as the money that “Ben” hands to “Mr. C.”

Also regarding to the camera use is the movement. In the first seconds of the action, traking shots and following shots move along with Costelo. This shows both his importance and how the action develops around him. Also, the use of zooming, mostly zooming in, will get “closer” to the characters face, showing the importance of this and to convert the shot into a close up, making the expression the action.

The framing in this scene is really Scorcian, asi in general, the characters are left to a side, as to show both the main character, but also his surroundings. Also, the camera changes the main focus whenever a hand on hand exchange is made, this is as to show one of the important parts of this movie, the exchange of money.

In second place, the use of sound is also very important in this extract. In the introduction footage of “some years ago”, diegetic sound will open the scene with the fight noises from the riots. This noises will continue, but will have a small importance. There is a part were a man is interviewed, and he says: But now, i don’t know, its a funny thing, they put hatred into your heart. In the beginning of the “action”, dialogue between Nicholson and the other characters. Most of the talking will be done by “Mr. C.”. As the action developes, Costelo’s voice will be a link between scenes.

Regarding to non-diegetic sound, at the first 10 seconds, there is no non diagetic sound, but in second 11, a voiceover starts, this is Costelo’s monologue, which will be an introduction for the action. Just 10 seconds after the monologue starts, the song “Gimme Shelter” by the Rolling Stones will start fading in. This song will remain as a backround untill young Collin speakes. At this point, the song will change to a bit instrumental song, and will return to “Gimme Shelter”, this song will sybolize two things. The fist one regards to the time this movie is stetted at the beginning, wich is the same time as this song was written, and on the other hand, is the theme of the song “ Rape, murder, is only a shot away”, representing the shifting shapes of people and the thin line between a cop and a gangster.

The editing of this extract is continuous and hollywoodian, and there are no transfers between scenes. The peace of the editing in this extract is settled according to the dialogue and the action. In general, this are long takes and have a fluid transition. A long take will in general be one in which the main character is tracked by the camera. There is no use of special effects in this extract.

The lighting of this introductory bit of the movie is really important. As the intention of this part is to introduce the audience with the action and specially with the characters, the entrance of Mr. Costello will be a very important segment. The cinematographer creates a sense of mystery and obscureness around this character, and as to achieve this, his face is always on the shadows, in a chiaroscurian way. Even when there is light in the room and the rest of the characters are illuminated, Costello’s face will always be on the shadows, and is illuminated at the end of the extract, when he makes his final statement: “When i was your age they would say, you can become cops or criminals, today, what I'm saying is this: when you are facing a loaded gun........What’s the difference?” This makes an ending for the establishing part of the character. Most of the lighting is artificial and pointed to specific subjects, but natural light is the sense that is generally intended, and in the execution it is fully natural.

Mise-en-sene in this extract is simply trying to get the senesce that this is settled in the 80’s or so. So, cars are from the 80’s, and the diner looks kind of around those times, classic american style, and some other key elements, such as an old fan creates the needed realism.

In conclusion, the opening 5 minutes from The Departed are one of the gratest parts of movies in history, and is really effective as it settles the audience with the main characters, time and space.